Earlier I posted on this blog how British citizenship is being increasingly shaped by foreign nationality laws. Foreign nationality laws become relevant in cases where a person is a dual citizen and is about to lose British citizenship. The common scenario is of national security cases where the government may decide to strip terrorism suspects of their British citizenship. Until recently, the government had to ensure the person affected had a remaining citizenship. This was to prevent creating statelessness. Affected people could challenge the loss of their British citizenship on the ground that they did not have any other citizenship to call their own. The court would then have to examine foreign nationality laws to determine if this was correct. In my last post I criticised how this exercise often becomes a technical assessment of foreign laws. Substantive rights arguments usually did not come up in these cases despite there being clear implications for right to family life (Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, ECHR) and right to fair trial (Article 6, ECHR). At that time I did not anticipate the rapid change of law that has made even the technical considerations of statelessness mostly redundant.
Recent posts
- Brexit means less hope for multiculturalism in the EU
- Targeted support is needed to protect the wellbeing of researchers working with emotionally challenging material
- Disabled people are already cutting back on costs more than others – for many, the £150 cost of living payment won’t do much to help
- Sending in the Royal Navy is not the answer to small boat migration in the Channel
- Understanding how COVID-19 impacted on people who use drugs
- Creative Industry Paradoxes: New business models and spaces of change
- Levelling-up: using the language of the government to maximise policy engagement opportunities
- The freedom to love: Mixed-immigration status couples and the immigration system
- The ‘New Plan for Immigration’: a further curtailment of rights
- How scientists and policymakers collaborate towards sustainable Bristol
- Modernising the Mental Health Act: Will more rights lead to less wrongs?
- Westminster, an inside account
- To make science reproducible, focus on prevention not cure
- To address ethnic inequalities in COVID-19, we must acknowledge the multifaceted influence of racism
- Continuing confusion about Universal Credit and couples
- Management consultants in healthcare do more harm than good, but keep getting rehired – new research
- “Getting your research in front of people who matter” – the benefits of policy placements
- What’s yours is mine …. Assumptions about couples in means-tested benefits
- COVID-19 school closures are threatening children’s oral language skills: but whole-school based interventions could help.
- Academic perspectives on civic engagement: case studies from the University of Bristol
Archives
Subscribe by Email
Completely spam free, opt out any time.
Please, insert a valid email.
Thank you, your email will be added to the mailing list once you click on the link in the confirmation email.
Spam protection has stopped this request. Please contact site owner for help.
This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.